The $70-a-Foot Flex Trap: Why I Offered $57 a Foot

The price per foot is the bait. The rent roll is the hook.

By Jeremiah Boucher  |  Founder & CEO, Patriot Holdings  ·  7 min read

My team and I look at a lot of deals. This one I walked personally — flew into Dallas, drove the site, talked to tenants working on a Saturday. On paper it's a steal: brand-new metal buildings at $70 a foot, below what it costs to build them. In reality, the price per foot is the bait. The rent roll is the hook.

Quick refresher: a cap rate is annual net operating income divided by price. Paying $3.3M for $189K of NOI is a 5.7% cap rate. Price and cap rate move inversely — the more you pay for the same income, the lower your yield.

What I Liked

The buildings are legitimately good. Solid metal paneling, 14-foot roll-ups with 16–18 foot clear height, a man door plus roll-up on every unit, individual electric meters, lighting and fire suppression throughout. The gap here is management and cosmetics — not structure. That's the kind of gap operators get paid to close.

Real demand from real users. Tenants were working on a Saturday when I walked it. Automotive and trade users want this product, and in-place rents around $9/SF gross leave room to move toward $10 all-in.

Priced below replacement cost — with a shrinking buyer pool. At ~$70/SF for new construction, you can't build this today for the ask. And it's a non-institutional size: too small for sophisticated players, too heavy a lift for passive buyers. Less competition is an edge if you're disciplined on price.

What I Didn't Like

The location caps the rents. Low-traffic, remote pocket with soft demographics. The tenant base this site attracts can pay about $10/SF gross all-in — full stop. Not $10 NNN plus reimbursements. When you underwrite to what these businesses can actually pay, the upside story shrinks fast.

The capex is real: $500K or more. Nothing is paved. The gravel drives are rough, drainage is a problem across the paving and parking areas, the gate keypad doesn't work, and the "signage" is a wooden leasing sign. That's not deferred maintenance — that's the second half of the construction budget the seller never spent.

At just over half leased, you're not buying cash flow — you're buying a job. Day one, after real expenses, this asset barely covers itself. Everything above that is a business plan you have to execute: lease-up, tenant curation, capital improvements. You need to get paid for that risk, and at $3.3M you're paying the seller for value you haven't created yet.

Seller Motivation Check

This is the section where we ask the question every buyer should ask: why is this deal for sale?

The seller is out-of-town, lives in another city, and has no interest in hands-on management of a rough-around-the-edges automotive park. His tougher tenants aren't income to him — they're liability. That's motivation.

Now layer on the market. Debt costs just moved 50 basis points against him, which thins the buyer pool further. Any serious buyer walking this site sees the same things I did: negative-to-flat day-one cash flow after real expenses, a $500K capital plan, and an operational turnaround on a low-credit tenant base. The dream buyer who pays $3.3M sight-unseen gets rarer every month.

His options are diminishing. Ours aren't. That's why the $2.7M offer stays on the table and we wait.

Read the P&L Like an Operator

Last issue, the trap was the tax line. Credit where it's due — this broker actually stepped the taxes up to a sale basis ($29K to $56K) and doubled the insurance. The trap just moved to a different line. Let's rebuild this one from the ground up, because the gap between the setup sheet and reality shows up in three separate places: day one, the income line, and the expense load.

Step 1: Day One — What You Actually Own at Closing

The as-is statement shows $189K of NOI on $71.5K of expenses — $1.52 per square foot. Nobody operates 47,000 square feet of multi-tenant flex for $1.52 a foot. Here's what that same in-place income looks like carrying real day-one costs:

Property taxes go to YOUR basis, not the seller's. Texas reassesses when the property trades. The seller's $29K tax bill is history the moment you close. At a $3.3M price, the county's new assessment puts that line near $75K. The broker's own Year 1 column concedes $56K — the truth is between his number and worse.

Insurance at the broker's own Year 1 figure: $27.5K. The current $11.7K reflects a policy you wouldn't want to be holding when something goes wrong on a site full of automotive users.

Management at 5% of collections. Not 4%. Running a park with this tenant profile properly — collections, enforcement, turnover — costs 5%, and pretending otherwise is how operations slide.

Marketing: $6K minimum. You're buying a park that's nearly half vacant. Vacant space doesn't lease itself, and there's no marketing line anywhere in this pro forma. Not year one, not year five.

Payroll and maintenance: $30K, not $13K. Gravel drives with drainage problems, a broken gate, and tenants who are hard on property. Thirteen thousand dollars doesn't cover the porta-john and the light bulbs.

Add it up: roughly $159K of real expenses — $3.38 per square foot — against the same $260K of in-place revenue. Day-one NOI: about $102K. At the $3.3M ask, that's a 3.1% cap rate. Not the 5.7% on the setup sheet — 3.1%. Debt at today's rates costs more than that, which means from the day you close, this deal eats cash every month until the business plan works. That's not a criticism of the deal. That's just what value-add is. But you'd better price it that way.

Step 2: The Income Line — The Same $10 Counted Twice

Now the pro forma. The reimbursement line grows from $33K in Year 1 to $142K by Year 5 — a "95% NNN conversion."

Here's the mechanic every investor should burn in: a tenant has exactly one number they can pay — their total occupancy cost. The lease structure just decides how that number gets sliced. On a gross lease, the tenant pays one check and the landlord covers taxes, insurance, and maintenance out of it. On a triple-net (NNN) lease, the tenant pays a lower base rent plus reimburses those expenses separately. Different paperwork. Same wallet.

The market says the wallet in this pocket holds about $10 per square foot, all-in. The pro forma's Year 5 math says tenants will pay $10.33 in base rent PLUS roughly $3 per foot in reimbursements — an effective occupancy cost over $13. That's a 33% raise on mom-and-pop auto shops in a low-traffic, low-demographic corridor. It will not happen. If you convert these leases to NNN — which is fine, we do it — the base rent has to drop so the all-in number stays near $10. NNN conversion changes who writes which check. It does not create new money.

So that $142K reimbursement line isn't income. It's the same $10 counted twice. Strip it out and the entire Year 5 story collapses.

Step 3: The Expense Lines That Quietly Vanished

Small lines tell you how a pro forma was built. Walk them:

Management: 4% vs. 5%. A one-point shave looks innocent — it's worth about $5–6K a year at stabilization. But it tells you the statement was built backwards from a target NOI, not forwards from how the asset actually runs.

Marketing: zero, in every year. A lease-up pro forma with no lease-up budget. Our floor on any flex park is $6K a year — more during initial lease-up.

Payroll + R&M: $15K, no payroll line at all. Automotive tenants are the hardest users in small bay. They leak fluids, they beat up doors, they fill yards. On a gravel site with drainage problems, the real stabilized number is $35K. This single line hides $20K of annual NOI — worth roughly $250K of price at a 7.75% cap rate.

Vacancy: 5% vs. our 8%. With month-to-month leases and low-credit tenants, one skip means months of downtime plus make-ready. Five percent vacancy is for stabilized parks with waiting lists. This isn't that.

Step 4: Put It Back Together — and Reprice the Deal

Rebuilt honestly: $470K of gross potential rent at $10 all-in, minus 8% vacancy and credit loss, gives $432K of collections. Real expenses run about $163K — a 38% expense ratio, which is exactly what gross-lease flex looks like when the landlord carries taxes, insurance, and maintenance. Stabilized NOI: roughly $269K.

The pro forma says $473K. The $204K gap is the whole story of this deal: $142K of phantom reimbursements, rent growth beyond what the pocket pays, and $40–50K of expenses that don't appear on paper but absolutely appear in your bank account.

Now the price. At the $3.3M ask plus $500K of capex, you're all-in $3.8M for $269K of stabilized NOI — a 7.1% yield on cost. The market values this asset class, in this location, with this tenant base, at a 7.5% to 8% cap rate on exit. Run the sale: $269K divided by a 7.75% cap rate is about $3.5M. You'd spend $3.8M and two years of work to build something worth $3.5M. That's not a thin deal — that's a guaranteed loss dressed up as value-add.

At $2.7M — $57 a foot — plus the same $500K, you're all-in $3.2M for an 8.4% yield on cost. Sixty-plus basis points of spread over the exit cap, real cash flow once stabilized, and a margin of safety if lease-up runs slow. That spread is the entire compensation for the risk. No spread, no deal.

Why I Made the Call

Pass at $3.3M — $70 a foot. Standing offer at $2.7M — $57 a foot.

First rule: protect capital. At the ask, the downside case — slow lease-up, a couple of tenant blowups, capex overruns on the drainage — puts you underwater with no exit. The seller's price already banks all the value the buyer is supposed to create.

Second: get paid for the risk you take. This is a value-add deal wearing a cash-flow costume. Half-leased, $500K of capex, low-credit tenants, remote location. That risk profile demands a real spread between yield on cost and exit cap. $2.7M delivers it. $3.3M doesn't.

The buildings are good. The demand is real. The price is wrong. So we wait — motivated sellers get more motivated.

Get the Next Breakdown

Every issue of The Patriot Deal Room breaks down a real deal we underwrote — real numbers, rebuilt P&Ls, and the discipline behind every pass and every buy. It's a working education in how to buy the best Small Bay "Flex" Industrial Parks in the country.

Subscribe on LinkedIn and on email (Kit) so you never miss an issue. And if you want to put capital to work alongside an operator who underwrites this way, that's exactly what we're doing in the Patriot Flex Fund.

— Jeremiah Boucher, CEO, Patriot Holdings